Simple Laboratory Test Utilization Interventions to Reduce Inappropriate Specialty Coagulation Testing

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The naming convention in coagulation may cause confusion in electronic ordering systems, leading to inappropriate test orders. We implemented test utilization efforts and studied utilization before and after interventions for two specialty coagulation assays. Methods: Two interventions were implemented: test names were changed from factor assay to activity, and residents reviewed all factor V and X requests. A retrospective review of factor V and X activity orders was performed for the period 1 year before and after interventions. Results: After interventions, factor V and X activity orders decreased by approximately 40%. Resulted tests decreased by 53.8% and 47.8%, corresponding to reductions of $2,493.05 and $1,867.80 per year in laboratory charges for factor V and factor X activity, respectively. Abnormal factor V activity results increased from 45% to 59%. Factor V activity orders from outpatient clinics decreased by 21.6%. Conclusions: Simple interventions can reduce inappropriate specialty coagulation test orders and unnecessary costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, H., Cunningham, A. M., & Harrington, A. M. (2020). Simple Laboratory Test Utilization Interventions to Reduce Inappropriate Specialty Coagulation Testing. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 153(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqz147

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free