Diabetic nephropathy: A comparison of the clinical and pathological features between the ckd risk classification and the classification of diabetic nephropathy 2014 in Japan

26Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Diabetic kidney disease is the main cause of end-stage kidney disease. However, the clinical manifestations of diabetic kidney disease are diverse. Therefore, the clinical classification of diabetic kidney disease is clinically important and valuable. In Japan, two clinical staging systems divided by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria can be used for diabetic kidney disease: the chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk classification and the Japanese classification of diabetic nephropathy. The Japanese classification of diabetic nephropathy and the CKD risk classification are similar; however, these two classification systems show different frequencies of outcomes. For example, the frequency of the kidney outcomes in stage 4 of the Japanese classification of diabetic nephropathy was found to be higher than that in the red stage of the CKD risk classification (composite kidney events: stage 4=32.0/100 person-years, red =14.5/100 person-years). However, there were no marked differences in the speed or rate of decline in the kidney function (speed: stage 4=6.8 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, red =5.8 mL/min/1.73 m2/year; rate: stage 4=38.8%/year, red =34.3%/year) or in the pathological changes between the two classifications. These data indicate that each stage of these clinical classification systems has characteristic clinical and pathological features. Therefore, it is important to understand each characteristic feature and use each classification system appropriately.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Furuichi, K., Shimizu, M., Hara, A., Toyama, T., & Wada, T. (2018). Diabetic nephropathy: A comparison of the clinical and pathological features between the ckd risk classification and the classification of diabetic nephropathy 2014 in Japan. Internal Medicine. Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.1132-18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free