Assessing AI-Based Code Assistants in Method Generation Tasks

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

AI-based code assistants are increasingly popular as a means to enhance productivity and improve code quality. This study compares four AI-based code assistants, GitHub Copilot, Tabnine, ChatGPT, and Google Bard, in method generation tasks, assessing their ability to produce accurate, correct, and efficient code. Results show that code assistants are useful, with complementary capabilities, although they rarely generate ready-to-use correct code.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corso, V., Mariani, L., Micucci, D., & Riganelli, O. (2024). Assessing AI-Based Code Assistants in Method Generation Tasks. In Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 380–381). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/3639478.3643122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free