How Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing is used in indigenous health research: A scoping review

5Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Our scoping review sought to describe how Etuaptmumk or Two-Eyed Seeing is used and reported on in Indigenous health research. Using the JBI scoping review methodology, we extracted uses of Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing from 83 articles and then categorized the reported uses of Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing according to Huria et al.'s eight CONSIDER statement domains (governance, prioritization, relationships, methodologies, participation, capacity, analysis and interpretation, and dissemination). We found that while authors used Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing in varied ways and at different stages of their research projects, characterizations of the guiding principle were often insufficiently described or overly simplified. This scoping review intends to contribute to a greater dialogue about how Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing is conceptualized and used in Indigenous health research with the goal of encouraging more intentional reporting of the guiding principle.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roher, S. I. G., Martin, D. H., Yu, Z., Pride, T., Amirault, M., Rand, J. R., & Benoit, A. C. (2024). How Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing is used in indigenous health research: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 19(9 September). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310247

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free