Intrauterine contraceptive device discontinuation among Jordanian women: Rate, causes and determinants

14Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) discontinuation rate and its causes and related factors among women attending UNRWA health centres in Jordan. Methods: The study cohort comprised 371 women who had an IUD inserted during 1997 and who were interviewed during their visits to the health centres in the period January-March 2003. The main outcome measure was IUD discontinuation. Results: The incidence of IUD discontinuation in the first year following insertion was 17.5%. Approximately 32% of the study sample continued using their devices after 5 years. The average duration of IUD use was 36 months. Of the 371 women, 39.6% discontinued IUD use because of a desire to conceive, 18.6% because of side effects, 4.9% because they were sexually inactive and 1.6% because of opposition from the woman's family. The most common side effects reported as reasons for discontinuation were bleeding, infection and pain. Discontinuation was inversely related to current age, marital age and number of living children. Outside camp residents, previous contraceptive users and women with obstetric complications were significantly less likely to discontinue IUD use. Conclusions: The crude cumulative rate of IUD discontinuation was 17.5% during the first year, suggesting a need to tackle the problem of discontinuation through effective educational strategies on the process of fertility and contraception. The most common reason for voluntary IUD removal was the women's desire to conceive. This suggests that improved counselling and good selection of candidates before IUD insertion is required.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khader, Y. S., El-Qaderi, S., & Khader, A. M. (2006). Intrauterine contraceptive device discontinuation among Jordanian women: Rate, causes and determinants. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 32(3), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1783/147118906777888279

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free