In situ habitat selection by settling larvae of marine soft-sediment invertebrates

56Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To test whether larval selectivity at settlement contributes to distributional patterns of benthic infauna we conducted three reciprocal sediment transplant experiments at 15-m-deep coarse-sand muddy-sand sites (~3 km apart) on the continental shelf near Tuckerton New Jersey. During 3- to 5-d deployments in 1994 larvae of the surfclam, Spisula solidissima selected coarse sand over muddy sand capitellid polychaetes selected muddy sand over coarse sand regardless of site. Thus larvae of both taxa selected sediments typical of adult habitats displaying selectivity consistent with previous flume experiments. Settlement intensity changed significantly over the ~6-week period during which experiments were conducted. Several other taxa exhibited selectivity consistent with field distributions several were nonselective. Significant site differences in settlement intensity were also observed on some dates for several taxa. Plankton pump samples taken at the sites during tray experiments suggested that significant differences in supply of surfclam larvae over the 3-km scale contributed to between-site differences in settlement. In the later experiments surfclams in experimental trays were larger than would be expected for recent settlers suggesting that postsettlement migration selectivity occurred on small scales. These experiments demonstrate that differences in larval supply over scales of kilometers time scales of weeks can affect settlement intensity but that habitat selection by settling larvae of some species of soft-sediment invertebrates may set initial distribution patterns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Snelgrove, P. V. R., Grassee, J. P., Grassle, J. F., Petrecca, R. F., & Hongguang, M. (1999). In situ habitat selection by settling larvae of marine soft-sediment invertebrates. Limnology and Oceanography, 44(5), 1341–1347. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.5.1341

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free