Quantifying Post-Swallow Residue in Healthy Aging

  • Jardine M
  • Miles A
  • Allen J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Reports are mixed on whether post-swallow residue increases with age. This question was investigated using a quantitative measure of residue in a large cohort of healthy adults. It was hypothesized that post-swallow residue would differ between younger and older healthy adults, and significantly increase in individuals ≥ 80 years. Method: In this observational study, 275 healthy volunteers aged 18-99 years underwent videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Post-swallow residue was quantified using the Bolus Clearance Ratio (BCR) for a 20-ml thin liquid barium bolus and 3-cm3 barium paste bolus. Number of swallows required per bolus and aspiration were also determined as additional markers of swallow efficiency and safety. Results: Most BCR values were low, < 0.05 (< 5% of the bolus) for 78% of 20 ml and 66% of paste swallows. BCR values were significantly larger in healthy older adults, although, clinically, the differences are arguably minimal (differences in mean BCR values between age groups: 20 ml: 0.01 [1%]; paste: 0.03 [3%]). For 20 ml, 56% of adults ≥ 80 years performed multiple swallows (oral residue and dose metering) versus 9% of adults 18-39 years. One aspiration event was observed. Conclusions: Post-swallow residue was slightly increased in older adults; many individuals ≥ 80 years performed more than one swallow per bolus to achieve this similar level of clearance. This suggests a reduction in swallow efficiency with age without compromising swallow safety. Post-swallow residue that poses a risk of airway invasion should be considered a sign of swallowing dysfunction, not healthy aging.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jardine, M., Miles, A., Allen, J., & Leonard, R. (2020). Quantifying Post-Swallow Residue in Healthy Aging. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(6), 1657–1665. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_persp-20-00087

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free