Body composition, resting metabolic rate, and energy requirements of short- and normal-stature, low-income guatemalan children

31Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We examined body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis and isotope dilution (18 and 2H), resting metabolic rate (RMR) by indirect calorimetry, and total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water in 15 short-stature (height-for-age ≤ -1.5 SD) and 15 normal-stature (height- forage > -1.5 SD) Guatemalan children aged 4-6 y. Although, in absolute terms significant group differences were found in fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass, and total body water (TBW), there were no significant differences in fat mass and TBW after adjustment for FFM. RMR of the short-stature children (3791 ± 376 kJ/d) was not significantly different from that of normal-stature children (4038 ± 531 kJ/d), and the regression between RMR and FFM was also not significantly different between groups. TEE was not significantly different in short-stature (4753 ± 761 kJ/d) compared with normal-stature children (5304 ± 1020 kJ/d); the regression between TEE and FFM was not significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant group differences in RMR and TEE after adjustment for FFM. FFM was the strongest predictor of TEE, but could only explain 29% of the variance. We conclude that 1) the lower TBW and fat mass in the short-stature group is proportional to their lower FFM, 2) there is no significant difference in either RMR or TEE between short- and normalstature children, and 3) TEE is highly variable among these children and cannot be explained by differences in body size alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wren, R. E., Blume, H., Mazariegos, M., Solomons, N., Alvarez, J. O., & Goran, M. I. (1997). Body composition, resting metabolic rate, and energy requirements of short- and normal-stature, low-income guatemalan children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 66(2), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/66.2.406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free