Struggle for control: General practitioners in the Swedish health care system

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper reports on findings on the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) in Sweden since the introduction of the Stockholm model. The research design was exploratory with the intention of discovering several perspectives shared by doctors. The subjects were asked to describe their work, how long they had been working and to describe whether they were familiar with the Stockholm model. Questions also focused on professional autonomy, the use of diagnostic related groups (DRGs), the isolation of work and the possible impact on patient care. While previous research suggests that doctors may be losing autonomy, the experience in Sweden, in particular, as it relates to GPs, may be different. Most of the doctors interviewed reported that the Stockholm model had increased productivity and efficiency, that economic incentives influenced their medical decisions and that medical treatment appears more patient focused than before. GPs reported an enhanced social and economic status within the medical profession since the introduction of the Stockholm model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quaye, R. K. (1997). Struggle for control: General practitioners in the Swedish health care system. European Journal of Public Health, 7(3), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/7.3.248

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free