Equality of Narrative Inclusion in Decision‑Making Processes: A Deliberative Approach

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between narrative inclusion and the notion of equality from the perspective of the theory of deliberative democracy. It is based on the assumption that taking into account the diversity of discursive competences influences the constructed justifications constituting the source of legitimacy of political decisions. Moving beyond a purely argumentative discourse towards emphasizing pluralism provides a significant enough modification of the theory to claim that it constitutes a separate model of deliberation. At the starting point, the role and purpose of narrative is presented, as well as the conditions under which it can be incorporated into deliberative processes. Then, consideration is given to the transformation of the category of equality that is brought about by introducing narrative to the framework of subject inclusion. The shift in meaning from unconditional equality to equalization of opportunities is also addressed, in both procedural and substantive terms. Finally, the paper outlines the possible practical problems and risks that the inclusion of narrative in deliberation may give rise to.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huk, M. Z. (2022). Equality of Narrative Inclusion in Decision‑Making Processes: A Deliberative Approach. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej, (3), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2022.3.49

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free