Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion processing for neuroradiologists: Model-dependent analysis may not be necessary for determining recurrent high-grade glioma versus treatment effect

16Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging has proved useful in determining whether a contrast-enhancing lesion is secondary to recurrent glial tumor or is treatment-related. In this article, we explore the best method for dynamic contrast-enhanced data analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients who met the following conditions: 1) had at least an initial treatment of a glioma, 2) underwent a half-dose contrast agent (0.05-mmol/kg) diagnostic-quality dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion study for an enhancing lesion, and 3) had a diagnosis by pathology within 30 days of imaging. The dynamic contrast-enhanced data were processed by using model-dependent analysis (nordicICE) using a 2-compartment model and model-independent signal intensity with time. Multiple methods of determining the vascular input function and numerous perfusion parameters were tested in comparison with a pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: The best accuracy (88%) with good correlation compared with pathology (P =.005) was obtained by using a novel, model-independent signal-intensity measurement derived from a brief integration beginning after the initial washout and by using the vascular input function from the superior sagittal sinus for normalization. Modeled parameters, such as mean endothelial transfer constant > 0.05 minutes-1, correlated (P =.002) but did not reach a diagnostic accuracy equivalent to the model-independent parameter. CONCLUSIONS: A novel model-independent dynamic contrast-enhanced analysis method showed diagnostic equivalency to more complex model-dependent methods. Having a brief integration after the first pass of contrast may diminish the effects of partial volume macroscopic vessels and slow progressive enhancement characteristic of necrosis. The simple modeling is technique- and observer-dependent but is less time-consuming.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hamilton, J. D., Lin, J., Ison, C., Leeds, N. E., Jackson, E. F., Fuller, G. N., … Kumar, A. J. (2015). Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion processing for neuroradiologists: Model-dependent analysis may not be necessary for determining recurrent high-grade glioma versus treatment effect. In American Journal of Neuroradiology (Vol. 36, pp. 686–693). American Society of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4190

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free