Resolution and reproducibility of BOLD and perfusion functional MRI at 3.0 tesla

21Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Visual and somatosensory activation studies were performed on normal subjects to compare the spatial discrimination and reproducibility between functional MRI (fMRI) methods based on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) and perfusion contrast. To allow simultaneous measurement of BOLD and perfusion contrast, a dedicated MRI acquisition technique was developed. Repeated experiments of sensory stimulation of single digits of the right hand showed an average variability of activation amplitude of 25% for BOLD data, and a significantly lower variability of 21% for perfusion data. No significant difference in the variability of the locus of activity was observed between the BOLD and perfusion data. In somatotopy experiments, digits II and V were subjected to passive sensory stimulation. Both the BOLD and perfusion data showed substantial overlap in the activation patterns from the two digits. In a retinotopy study, two stimuli were alternated to excite different patches of V1. Again there was substantial overlap between the activation patterns from both stimuli, although the perfusion performed somewhat better than the BOLD method. Particularly for the visual studies, the overlap in activation patterns was more than expected based on the fine-scale retinotopic mapping of cortical activity, suggesting that both BOLD and perfusion contrast mechanisms contribute substantially to the point-spread function (PSF).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Gelderen, P., Wu, C. W. H., De Zwart, J. A., Cohen, L., Hallett, M., & Duyn, J. H. (2005). Resolution and reproducibility of BOLD and perfusion functional MRI at 3.0 tesla. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 54(3), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20577

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free