FURTHER EVALUATION OF ANTECEDENT INTERVENTIONS ON COMPLIANCE: THE EFFECTS OF RATIONALES TO INCREASE COMPLIANCE AMONG PRESCHOOLERS

  • Wilder D
  • Allison J
  • Nicholson K
  • et al.
21Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Functional analyses were conducted to identify reinforcers for noncompliance exhibited by 6 young children. Next, the effects of rationales (statements that describe why a child should comply with a caregiver‐delivered instruction) were evaluated. In Experiment 1, 3 participants received the rationales immediately after the therapist's instruction. In Experiment 2, 3 additional participants received more practical rationales immediately before the therapist's instruction. The results indicate that rationales were ineffective for all 6 children. A guided compliance procedure increased compliance for 1 child; contingent access to preferred items with or without response cost increased compliance for the other participants. Although levels of problem behavior varied within and across participants, they were often higher in the rationale and guided compliance conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilder, D. A., Allison, J., Nicholson, K., Abellon, O. E., & Saulnier, R. (2010). FURTHER EVALUATION OF ANTECEDENT INTERVENTIONS ON COMPLIANCE: THE EFFECTS OF RATIONALES TO INCREASE COMPLIANCE AMONG PRESCHOOLERS. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(4), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free