Analysis of Cochlear Morphology for Cochlear Implantation Using Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Computed Tomography Images

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative evaluation of cochlear morphology is important for successful cochlear implantation. This study analyzed the cochlear canal by three-dimensional reconstructions of temporal bones using computed tomography (CT). Methods: Fifty temporal bones from 25 patients aged 42-74 years were evaluated. The inner spaces of the bony cochlea were reconstructed using a surface rendering technique on the CT images. Eight angular points (P0-P7) every 90° were selected from 0° to 630° from the center of the round window using the reconstructed cochlear canal images. The radius (R) and thickness (T) of the cochlear canal at each point were measured. The cochlear canal length (CoCL) was estimated using an equation based on the radius at each point. The cochlear width and height based on multiplanar CT images were also measured and comparedwith the length and volume of the cochlear canal. Results: The mean CoCL from 0° to 630° was 31.5 mm, and the cochlear volume was 55.9 mm3. The CoCL to P7 was correlated with the cochlear volume (r = 0.77), coiling ratios (R4/R0, r = 0.47; R5/R1, r = 0.384), cochlear width (long) (r = 0.539), cochlear height (r = 0.385), and total thickness at each point (r = 0.475). The cochlear volume was correlated with CoCL (630°) (r = 0.77), coiling ratio (R4/R0, r = 0.367), cochlear width (long) (r = 0.616), cochlear height (r = 0.447), and total T (r = 0.566). Conclusion: Preoperative evaluation using three-dimensional reconstruction can elucidate the size and shape of the cochlear canal before cochlear implantation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jun, B., & Song, S. (2024). Analysis of Cochlear Morphology for Cochlear Implantation Using Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Computed Tomography Images. Audiology and Neurotology, 29(3), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1159/000534739

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free