Alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damage

Abstract

One of the most common methods adopted in the rehabilitation of corrosion-damaged concrete is the patch repair procedure. However, in practice this method has shown to often be unreliable as a consequence of the widespread occurrence of shrinkage induced cracking and poor substrate-patch adhesion leading to debonding of the patch repair. From a practical point of view, such failed repair systems essentially restore the repaired concrete back to a deteriorated state. There is a common belief that repairing concrete with specialised proprietary repair materials would guarantee durability. However, the widespread premature failure of patch repairs conducted using such materials has proven the contrary. This paper presents an understanding of the materials and issues concerning the durability and serviceability of concrete patch repairs, with the aim of identifying alternative non-structural patch repair materials for the effective repair of corrosion-damaged concrete structures. The potential patch repair materials researched were polymer-cement concrete (copolymer of vinyl acetate and ethylene with 5% cement replacement) and 60%, 80% and 100% fly ash (FA) mortar. Patch repairs were conducted on substrate moulds to test application and observe cracking/debonding occurrence. Furthermore, compressive strength, durability index, accelerated drying shrinkage, restrained shrinkage, workability and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) tests were conducted to determine the properties of the materials developed with reference to performance requirements of durable concrete repairs. It was concluded that the 60% FA and polymer-cement concrete repair materials had the best overall performance. This research established that innovative alternative repair materials such as a 60% FA or polymer-cement concrete material, can be developed for non-structural patch repairs with improved long-term performance relative to conventional materials.