Collection of tracheal aspirate: Safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques

5Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety of the performance of the traditional and protected collection techniques of tracheal aspirate and to identify qualitative and quantitative agreement of the results of microbiological cultures between the techniques. Method: Clinical, prospective, comparative, singleblind research. The sample was composed of 54 patients of >18 years of age, undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for a period of ≥48 hours and with suspected Ventilator Associated Pneumonia. The two techniques were implemented in the same patient, one immediately after the other, with an order of random execution, according to randomization by specialized software. Results: No significant events occurred oxygen desaturation, hemodynamic instability or tracheobronchial hemorrhage (p<0.05) and, although there were differences in some strains, there was qualitative and quantitative agreement between the techniques (p<0.001). Conclusion: Utilization of the protected technique provided no advantage over the traditional and execution of both techniques was safe for the patient.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frota, O. P., Ferreira, A. M., Da Silva Barcelos, L., Watanabe, E., Carvalho, N. C. P., & Rigotti, M. A. (2014). Collection of tracheal aspirate: Safety and microbiological concordance between two techniques. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem, 48(4), 618–624. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0080-623420140000400007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free