Surgical strategy of lumbopelvic instrumentation in the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis: S2-alar-iliac screws vs iliac screws

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) and iliac screw (IS) techniques in the lumbopelvic reconstruction of lumbosacral tuberculosis patients. From January 2014 to August 2016, 26 patients with lumbosacral tuberculosis attending the 8th Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital were included in this retrospective study. The subjects were divided into two groups based on the lumbopelvic fixation type (16 patients in the S2AI group, 10 patients in the IS group). The operation time, blood loss, length of hospitalisation, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), ambulatory status, and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores of the patients in two groups were recorded and compared. In addition, surgical complications were collected and analysed. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly lower in the S2AI group than that in the IS group (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, L., Li, L., Li, D., Luo, Z., Liu, N., Wu, Y., … Cui, X. (2022, December 1). Surgical strategy of lumbopelvic instrumentation in the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis: S2-alar-iliac screws vs iliac screws. International Wound Journal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13795

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free