Prognostic indicators of colon tumors. The gastrointestinal tumor study group experience

201Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study sought to replicate and expand findings reported by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) on prognostic factors in resectable colon cancer. Mantel‐Haenszel tests and the Cox model were used to analyze prognostic significance and effect of primary disease symptoms and tumor location in 572 patients from the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG), with resected Dukes' B2 and C colon cancer. Tumor location (left, right, and rectosigmoid/sigmoid) was of low prognostic importance (P> 0.10), and did not effect survival or disease‐free survival (P> 0.10). Obstruction was an important indicator of prognosis, independent of Dukes' stage (P = 0.03). Bowel perforation is associated with poor prognosis in disease‐free survival (P = 0.001). Rectal bleeding had a positive impact on survival (P = 0.08). Thus, obstruction, perforation, and rectal bleeding (but not location) are found to be prognostic factors in patients with Dukes' B2 or C colon cancer. Copyright © 1986 American Cancer Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steinberg, S. M., Barkin, J. S., Kaplan, R. S., & Stablein, D. M. (1986). Prognostic indicators of colon tumors. The gastrointestinal tumor study group experience. Cancer, 57(9), 1866–1870. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19860501)57:9<1866::AID-CNCR2820570928>3.0.CO;2-T

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free