Mechanistic comparison of Bacillus subtilis 6S-1 and 6S-2 RNAs-commonalities and differences

Abstract

Bacterial 6S RNAs bind to the housekeeping RNA polymerase (σ;A-RNAP in Bacillus subtilis) to regulate transcription in a growth phase-dependent manner. B. subtilis expresses two 6S RNAs, 6S-1 and 6S-2 RNA, with different expression profiles. We show in vitro that 6S-2 RNA shares hallmark features with 6S-1 RNA: Both (1) are able to serve as templates for pRNA transcription; (2) bind with comparable affinity to σ;A-RNAP; (3) are able to specifically inhibit transcription from DNA promoters, and (4) can form stable 6S RNA:pRNA hybrid structures that (5) abolish binding to σ;A-RNAP. However, pRNAs of equal length dissociate faster from 6S-2 than 6S-1 RNA, owing to the higher A,U-content of 6S-2 pRNAs. This could have two mechanistic implications: (1) Short 6S-2 pRNAs (<10 nt) dissociate faster instead of being elongated to longer pRNAs, which could make it more difficult for 6S-2 RNA-stalled RNAP molecules to escape from the sequestration; and (2) relative to 6S-1 RNA, 6S-2 pRNAs of equal length will dissociate more rapidly from 6S-2 RNA after RNAP release, which could affect pRNA turnover or the kinetics of 6S-2 RNA binding to a new RNAP molecule. As 6S-2 pRNAs have not yet been detected in vivo, we considered that cellular RNAP release from 6S-2 RNA might occur via 6S-1 RNA displacing 6S-2 RNA from the enzyme, either in the absence of pRNA transcription or upon synthesis of very short 6S-2 pRNAs (5-mers, which would escape detection by deep sequencing). However, binding competition experiments argued against these possibilities. © 2014 Calidas et al.