Long-term outcomes of resection versus transplantation for neuroendocrine liver metastases meeting the Milan criteria

30Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Liver resection (LR) is considered the treatment of choice for resectable neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), while liver transplantation (LT) is currently reserved for highly selected unresectable patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive patients undergoing either curative resection or transplantation for liver-only NELM meeting Milan criteria at a single center between 1984 and 2019. Patients who fit Milan criteria were 48 in the transplantation group and 56 in the resection group. After a median follow-up of 158 months for the transplantation group and 126 for the resection group, the 10-year survival rate was 93% for transplantation and 75% for resection (p =.007). The 10-year disease-free survival rate was 52% for transplantation and 18% for resection (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maspero, M., Rossi, R. E., Sposito, C., Coppa, J., Citterio, D., & Mazzaferro, V. (2022). Long-term outcomes of resection versus transplantation for neuroendocrine liver metastases meeting the Milan criteria. American Journal of Transplantation, 22(11), 2598–2607. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17156

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free