Impact of the modality of mechanical ventilation on bleeding during pituitary surgery: A single blinded randomized trial

5Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background:Bleeding modifies the surgeon's view of the field during transsphenoidal endoscopic pituitary surgery. Since ventilation can alter venous return, we compared the effect of volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) on intraoperative bleeding.Methods:Eighty-six patients were randomized to VCV or PCV in this single blinded study; comparisons concerned 42 in the PCV group and 43 in the VCV group.Results:Intraoperative bleeding, the primary endpoint, did not differ between groups whether analysis focused on 7 levels of the score, from minimal bleeding to bleeding with significant change in the conduct of surgical procedure (P=.89) or on a stratification into 3 categories, mild, moderate, and major (P=.47). Median [interquartile range] peak airway pressure was lower in the PCV group (13.5 [12.5-15] vs 16.3 [14.4-19.1] cm H2O, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Le Guen, M., Paternot, A., Declerck, A., Feliot, E., Gayat, E., Gaillard, S., … Kork, F. (2019). Impact of the modality of mechanical ventilation on bleeding during pituitary surgery: A single blinded randomized trial. Medicine (United States), 98(38). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017254

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free