Positionality and praxis: Fieldwork experiences in rural India

127Citations
Citations of this article
155Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper provides a reflexive account of conducting fieldwork as a graduate student in the Sunderban area of West Bengal state, India, in the mid-1990s. Reflecting on my personal experiences of research in a setting that was simultaneously familiar and foreign, I use frames of positionality to understand the impact of explicit and implied power structures on the research process, the relationships between the researcher and those researched, and the transfer of knowledge. This paper argues that the multiple subject positions and identities of both scholar and subjects as presented in the field vary with setting, and that these positionalities affect access to informants, the tenor and outcomes of encounters, and knowledge production. While self-reflexivity is endorsed as a strategy for critically informed research, active measures such as openness about the agenda and activities undertaken, self-disclosure, making conscious accommodations for the research subject's work schedule and time constraints, mutual sharing of information, and explicit recognition of the research subjects' expertise through lived experiences are proposed as strategies for equalising the power balance between scholar and subject. © 2004 Department of Geography, National University of Singapore and Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chacko, E. (2004). Positionality and praxis: Fieldwork experiences in rural India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00172.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free