Flemish obstetricians personal preference regarding induction of labor and mode of delivery in term births

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: In a 2002 survey, 2% of Flemish gynecologists preferred elective cesarean section for themselves or their partner. This study aims to determine actual preference regarding induction of labor and mode of delivery in term cephalic or breech births for gynecologists or their partners. Materials and Methods: An anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to all gynecologists and trainees in Flanders. Results: Response rate was 28.2 % (241/852). In case of an uncomplicated cephalic singleton pregnancy, 39 gynecologists (16.2%) preferred cesarean section. Most (n=134, 66.5%) chose induction at 41 weeks, 26 (13%) at 40 weeks, 37 (18%) at 42 weeks, 26 (13%) at 40 weeks, three (1.5%) preferred induction before 40 weeks and two (1%) would wait until after 42 weeks. Concerning term breech, 30% (n=72) opted for vaginal delivery and 70% (n = 169) for planned cesarean section. Ninety-nine (41%) gynecologists preferred to attempt external version first. Only 115 (47.7 %) gynecologists felt professionally capable to assist vaginal breech delivery themselves; about one-Third (n=96; 38%) had performed less than ten vaginal breech deliveries in their career. Conclusions: Flemish gynecologists are still in favor of vaginal delivery for themselves in terms of cephalic position, but an increasing number favor planned cesarean section. Most Flemish gynecologists opt for cesarean section for themselves or their partners in case of term breech and state that they do not feel capable in assisting vaginal breech delivery for their patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sonnemans, H., Schmid, A., Muys, J., & Jacquemyn, Y. (2016). Flemish obstetricians personal preference regarding induction of labor and mode of delivery in term births. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, 43(6), 792–794. https://doi.org/10.12891/ceog3404.2016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free