Interval mapping for loci affecting unordered categorical traits

8Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Many traits including shapes and colors of flowers, fruits and seeds in plants, as well as coat colors and some behavioral properties in animals, are recorded in discrete categories. If categories are ordered, genetic analyses of the categorical traits are often performed using the threshold model, which considers a latent continuous variable, called the liability, underlying a trait and assumes the monotonic relationship between the phenotype and the liability. In some categorical traits, however, descriptions of phenotypes are purely nominal and the phenotypic scores cannot be ordered. The threshold model is unreasonable for the analyses of such unordered categorical traits. In this study, we developed a method for interval mapping of loci affecting unordered categorical traits with more than two categories. The probability of the phenotype of an individual falling in each of the categories was expressed by a polychotomous logistic model, in which the log-odds for each category relative to the reference category were assumed to follow a linear model including genotype at a locus affecting a trait as covariate. Based on the model, the interval mapping using a maximum likelihood method was devised for the analysis of complex categorical traits described with unordered categories. We confined ourselves to the case of F2 populations derived from a cross between two inbred lines, although this approach can easily be extended to the analyses for other populations of general structures. As results of analyses of simulated data show, the method showed high efficiency in detecting the loci affecting unordered categorical traits. © 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayashi, T., & Awata, T. (2006). Interval mapping for loci affecting unordered categorical traits. Heredity, 96(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800783

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free