Enterprise risk management in private firms: Does ownership structure matter?

13Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Private firms adopt Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) practices voluntarily. Using results of a survey that involved 78 respondents, we investigate the adoption of ERM practices in Italian private corporations and question whether ERM adoption is affected by the ownership structure of the firm. We find that agency conflicts between controlling and minority shareholders, which arise when ownership dispersion decreases, affect ERM adoption, and that when proprietorship is more dispersed, the firm places more focus on ERM projects. Additionally, we document the different roles of different types of owners. More specifically, in line with the patronage agency theory, the government-controlled enterprises undergo more intense ERM, whereas, in line with behavioral agency theory, individual and family-controlled firms pay less attention to ERM adoption.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mafrolla, E., Matozza, F., & D’Amico, E. (2016). Enterprise risk management in private firms: Does ownership structure matter? Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(2), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v32i2.9603

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free