National priorities for perioperative research in South Africa

17Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. Perioperative research is currently unco-ordinated in South Africa (SA), with no clear research agenda. Objective. To determine the top ten national research priorities for perioperative research in SA. Methods. A Delphi technique was used to establish consensus on the top ten research priorities. Results. The top ten research priorities were as follows: (i) establishment of a national database of (a) critical care outcomes, and (b) critical care resources; (ii) a randomised controlled trial of preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide-guided medical therapy to decrease major adverse cardiac events following non-cardiac surgery; (iii) a national prospective observational study of the outcomes associated with paediatric surgical cases; (iv) a national observational study of maternal and fetal outcomes following operative delivery in SA; (v) a steppedwedge trial of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for (a) surgery, (b) obstetrics, (c) emergency surgery, and (d) trauma surgery; (vi) a stepped-wedge trial of a surgical safety checklist on patient outcomes in SA; (vii) a prospective observational study of perioperative outcomes after surgery in district general hospitals in SA; (viii) short-course interventions to improve anaesthetic skills in rural doctors; (ix) studies of the efficacy of simulation training to improve (a) patient outcomes, (b) team dynamics, and (c) leadership; and (x) development and validation of a risk stratification tool for SA surgery based on the South African Surgical Outcomes Study (SASOS) data. Conclusions. These research priorities provide the structure for an intermediate-term research agenda.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biccard, B. M., Alphonsus, C. S., Bishop, D. G., Cronje, L., Kluyts, H. L., Kusel, B., … Wise, R. D. (2016). National priorities for perioperative research in South Africa. South African Medical Journal, 106(5), 485–488. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i5.10269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free