Oral Reading Assessment: Four Conditions Where Caution Is Warranted

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Assessments of oral reading are widely used for screening, progress monitoring, and comprehensive evaluations. Despite the utility and technical adequacy of these tools, there are subgroups of students for whom measures of oral reading may be inappropriate. The first section of this article focuses on how tests of oral reading may underestimate word reading ability and reading fluency among four subgroups of students with speech, language, or learning difficulties. These include school-age students who demonstrate word-finding difficulties (which are common among students with a learning disability or developmental language disorder), developmental stuttering, childhood apraxia of speech, and pediatric dysarthria. The second section offers practical recommendations for more accurate assessment procedures, correct placement decisions, relevant professional learning activities, and strategic interdisciplinary teaming.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zipoli, R. P., & Ramachandar, S. (2024). Oral Reading Assessment: Four Conditions Where Caution Is Warranted. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 49(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231220526

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free