Study for treatment effects and prognostic factors of bronchial asthma - Follow up over 2 years

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Asthma causes recurrent episodes of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, and cough. These symptoms are usually associated with widespread but variable airflow limitation that is partly reversible either spontaneously or with treatment. The inflammation also cause an associated increase in airway responsiveness to a variety of stimuli. Method: Of the 403 adult bronchial asthma patients enrolled from March 1992 to March 1994 in Allergy Clinics of Severance Hospital in Yonsei University, this study reviewed the 97 cases to evaluate the treatment effects and to analyse prognostic factors. The patients were classified to five groups according to treatment responses; group 1 (non control group): patients who were not controlled daring following up, group 2 (high step treatment group): patients who were controlled longer than 3 months by stop 3 or 4 treatment of 'Global initiative for asthma, Global strategy for asthma management and prevention'(NHIJBI/WHO) with PFR(%) larger than 80%, group 3 (short term control group): patients who were controlled less than I year by stop l or 2 treatment of NHLBI/WHO, group 4 (intermediate term control group): patients who were controlled for more than 1 year but less than 2 years by stop 1 or 2 treatment of NHLBI/WHO, group 5 (long term control group): patients who were controlled for more than 2 years by step 1 or 2 treatment of NHLBI/WHO. Especially the patients-who were controlled more than 1 year with negatively converted methacholine test and no eosinophil in sputum were classified to methacholine negative conversion group. We reviewed patients history, atopy score, total IgE, specific IgE, methacholine PC20 and peripheral blood eosinophil count, pulmonary function test, steroid doses and aggrevation numbers after treatment. Results: On analysis of 98 patients, 20 cases(20.6%) were classified to group 1, 26 cases(26-8%) to group 2, 23 cases(23.7%) to group 3, 15 cases(15.5%) to group 4, and 13 cases(13.4%) to groups 5. There were no differences of sex, asthma type, family history, smoking history, allergic rhinitis and aspirin allergy among the groups. In long term control group, asthma onset age was younger, symptom duration was shorter, and initial pulmonary function was better. The long term control group required lower amounts of oral steroid, had less aggrevation during first 3months after starting treatment and shorter duration from enrollment to control. Atopy, allergic skin test, sputum and blood eosinophil, total IgE, nonspecific bronchial responsiveness was not significantly different among the groups. Seven out of 28 patients who were controlled more than 1 years showed negatively converted methacholine test and no eosinophils in the sputum. The mean control duration was 20.3 ± 9.7 months and relapse did not occur. Conclusion: Patients who had asthma of onset age younger, shorter symptom duration, better PFT, lower treatment initial steps, lower amounts of steroid needs and less aggravation numbers after starting treatment were classified in the long term control groups compared to the others.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

So Young Choung, Jung Won Park, Sung Kyu Kim, & Hong, C. S. (1997). Study for treatment effects and prognostic factors of bronchial asthma - Follow up over 2 years. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 44(3), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1997.44.3.559

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free