Is the surface topography a helpful tool for the management of scoliosis?

  • Papadopoulos D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The aim is to reveal the importance of surface topography in complement to the x-rays [1,2]. Material(s) and Method(s): We have used the Formetric 4D-Dicom II system, which is supplied also with lateral Cobb angle measurement. We have examined 616 patients (432 females and 184 males), age 5 y to 21 y. The patients have been visited clinically by inspection, Adams forward bending test and Perdriolle scoliometer. We have fit, to every patient, 4-8 reflectors on the apex of T1 through L4 spinal process and 2 shoulder reflectors to get the possibility for lateral Cobb angle measurement with the Formetric 4D. Result(s): We had various data through surface topography. Torsion, rotation, shoulder tilt, etc, but we have insisted on the Cobb angle measurement. We had a >95% accuracy in Scoliosis between 22degree and 65degree Cobb angle. The accuracy was lower, between 95% to 70%, if the measured curve was > 65degree and very poor, less than 50%, when the curve was < than 20degree in x-rays. As it concerns the Kyphosis, the cob angle was very accurate as it was exceeded 90%. Conclusion(s): We believe that the surface topography is a precious tool for the diagnosis and follow up of a complex three dimensional skeletal deformity, such as scoliosis. The accuracy of the Cobb angle measurement is excellent and we believe that we must move to the next step, which is the 3D dimension.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papadopoulos, D. (2012). Is the surface topography a helpful tool for the management of scoliosis? Scoliosis, 7(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-s1-o17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free