Freedom from nuclear weapons? IHRL and IHL perspective vs the state-centred approach

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

23 years after the ICJ's Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, a general treaty prohibiting the use of nuclear weapons has been adopted. It may be anticipated that the TPNW will probably not enter into force very soon, and when it does, it will neither be universally accepted, nor will it significantly influence the practice of the nuclear weapon States. It is therefore justified to analyse the problem under consideration, not from a State-oriented perspective, but from a human and environmentally centred one. The article argues not only that any use of nuclear weapons would be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, in particular the principles and rules of international humanitarian law, but it would also violate international human rights law. The article further dwells upon the customary international law aspects of the problem under consideration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kapelańska-Prêgowska, J. (2020, June 15). Freedom from nuclear weapons? IHRL and IHL perspective vs the state-centred approach. Age of Human Rights Journal. Universidad de Jaen. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v14.5481

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free