Therapies after first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR m+ NSCLC in Japan: Retrospective analysis of LUX-Lung 3

4Citations
Citations of this article
135Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors is inevitable in non-small-cell lung cancer. To inform subsequent treatment decisions, we retrospectively assessed therapies following afatinib in Japanese patients from LUX-Lung 3. Patients & methods: LUX-Lung 3 was a randomized, open-label, Phase III study of afatinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed in treatment-naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Results: Among 47 Japanese patients who discontinued first-line afatinib, 91/81/62% received ≥one/two/three subsequent therapies. The most common second-line therapies were platinum-based chemotherapy (38%) and a first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (17%). Median overall survival (afatinib vs cisplatin/pemetrexed) was 47.8 versus 35.0 months (not significant). Conclusion: First-line afatinib does not appear to diminish suitability for subsequent therapies in EGFRm+ non-small-cell lung cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yoshioka, H., Kato, T., Okamoto, I., Tanaka, H., Hida, T., Seto, T., … Yamamoto, N. (2020). Therapies after first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR m+ NSCLC in Japan: Retrospective analysis of LUX-Lung 3. Future Oncology, 16(4), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0659

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free