A COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES FOR ELIMINATING SELF‐INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR OF RETARDED ADOLESCENTS 1

  • Corte H
  • Wolf M
  • Locke B
128Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An attempt was made to eliminate the self‐injurious behaviors of four institutionalized, profoundly retarded adolescents. Some of the behaviors studied were: face‐slapping, face‐banging, hair‐pulling, face‐scratching, and finger‐biting. Three remediative approaches to self‐injurious behavior were compared. Elimination of all social consequences of the self‐injurious behavior was not effective with the two subjects with whom it was attempted. The same two subjects were exposed to a procedure involving reinforcement of non‐self‐injurious behavior which was ineffective under no food deprivation and was effective with one of the two subjects under mild food deprivation. Electric‐shock punishment eliminated the self‐injurious behaviors of all four subjects with whom it was attempted. The results suggested that punishment was more effective than differential reinforcement of non‐self‐injurious behavior which, in turn, was more effective than extinction through elimination of social consequences. However, the effects of the punishment were usually specific to the setting in which it was administered. In order to eliminate the self‐injurious behaviors of severely retarded children, it is apparently necessary to carry out the treatment in many of the settings in which it occurs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corte, H. E., Wolf, M. M., & Locke, B. J. (1971). A COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES FOR ELIMINATING SELF‐INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR OF RETARDED ADOLESCENTS 1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1971.4-201

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free