18F-FDG PET/CT for therapy control in vascular graft infections: A first feasibility study

41Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of PET/CT with 18F-FDG for therapy control in patients with prosthetic vascular graft infections (PVGIs). Methods: In this single-center, observational, prospective cohort study, 25 patients with a median age of 66 y (range, 48-81 y) who had a proven PVGI were included. Followup 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed at a median of 170 d (range, 89-249 d) after baseline examination. Two independent and masked interpreters measured maximum standardized uptake values to quantify metabolic activity and analyzed whole-body datasets for a secondary diagnosis (i.e., infectious foci not near the graft). The metabolic activity of the graft was correlated with clinical information and 2 laboratory markers (C-reactive protein and white blood cell count). Results: 18F-FDG PET/CT had an impact on management in all patients. In 19 of 25 patients (76%), antibiotic treatment was continued because of the results of follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT. Antibiotic treatment was stopped or changed in 8% and 16% of patients, respectively. In 8 patients (32%), additional incidental findings were detected on follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT and had a further impact on patient management. Only in a subgroup of patients with PVGI and no other sites of infection was a significant correlation found between the difference in C-reactive protein at the time of baseline and follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT and the difference in maximum standardized uptake value (n 5 11; R2 = 0.67; P = 0.002). Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT represents a useful tool in therapy monitoring of PVGI and has an impact on patient management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Husmann, L., Sah, B. R., Scherrer, A., Burger, I. A., Stolzmann, P., Weber, R., … Hasse, B. (2015). 18F-FDG PET/CT for therapy control in vascular graft infections: A first feasibility study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 56(7), 1024–1029. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.156265

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free