EFFECTS of RELIGIOUS VERSUS STANDARD COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY on OPTIMISM in PERSONS with MAJOR DEPRESSION and CHRONIC MEDICAL ILLNESS

33Citations
Citations of this article
176Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background We compared the effectiveness of religiously integrated cognitive behavioral therapy (RCBT) versus standard CBT (SCBT) on increasing optimism in persons with major depressive disorder (MDD) and chronic medical illness. Methods Participants aged 18-85 were randomized to either RCBT (n = 65) or SCBT (n = 67) to receive ten 50-min sessions remotely (94% by telephone) over 12 weeks. Optimism was assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks by the Life Orientation Test-Revised. Religiosity was assessed at baseline using a 29-item scale composed of religious importance, individual religious practices, intrinsic religiosity, and daily spiritual experiences. Mixed effects growth curve models were used to compare the effects of treatment group on trajectory of change in optimism. Results In the intention-to-treat analysis, both RCBT and SCBT increased optimism over time, although there was no significant difference between treatment groups (B = -0.75, SE = 0.57, t = -1.33, P =.185). Analyses in the highly religious and in the per protocol analysis indicated similar results. Higher baseline religiosity predicted an increase in optimism over time (B = 0.07, SE = 0.02, t = 4.12, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koenig, H. G., Pearce, M. J., Nelson, B., & Daher, N. (2015). EFFECTS of RELIGIOUS VERSUS STANDARD COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY on OPTIMISM in PERSONS with MAJOR DEPRESSION and CHRONIC MEDICAL ILLNESS. Depression and Anxiety, 32(11), 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22398

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free