Brain MRI, lumbar CSF monoamine concentrations, and clinical descriptors of patients with spinocerebellar ataxia mutations

14Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives - To serially assess changes in lumbar CSF biogenic amines, radiographic characteristics, and neurological signs in 34 patients with dominantly inherited ataxia. Methods - Mutational analysis was used to identify genetic subgroups. Annual assessment of lumbar CSF monoamine metabolites using a gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric method and morphometric measurements of the cerebellum, pens, and the cervical spinal cord on MRI were analysed for each patient and compared with normal controls. Results - Patients with CAG trinucleotide repeat expansions on chromosome 6p (mutSCA1) and chromosome 14q (mutSCA3) had only about one half the normal concentrations of lumbar CSF homovanillic acid (HVA) whereas, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) concentrations were similar to those in age matched normal subjects. The HVA and 5-HIAA concentrations in clinically similar patients without mutSCA1 or mutSCA3 were normal. One year after the first study, HVA concentrations were reduced by a mean of 22% regardless of the patient's SCA mutation. Abnormalities on MRI were consistent with a spinopontine atrophy in patients with mutSCA3, spinopontocerebellar atrophy in patients with mutSCA1, and 'pure' cerebellar atrophy in patients without these mutations. Conclusions - Quantitative MRI measurements were not useful in monitoring progression of disease but lumbar CSF HVA concentrations and total scores on a revised version of the ataxia clinical rating scale seemed to progress in parallel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Higgins, J. J., Harvey-White, J. D., Nee, L. E., Colli, M. J., Grossi, T. A., & Kopin, I. J. (1996). Brain MRI, lumbar CSF monoamine concentrations, and clinical descriptors of patients with spinocerebellar ataxia mutations. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 61(6), 591–595. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.61.6.591

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free