Restricted turing machines and language recognition

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In 1965 Hennie proved that one-tape deterministic Turing machines working in linear time are equivalent to finite automata, namely they characterize regular languages. This result has been improved in different directions, by obtaining optimal lower bounds for the time that one-tape deterministic and nondeterministic Turing machines need to recognize nonregular languages. On the other hand, in 1964 Kuroda showed that one-tape Turing machines that are not allowed to use any extra space, besides the part of the tape which initially contains the input, namely linear bounded automata, recognize exactly contextsensitive languages. In 1967 Hibbard proved that for each integer d ≥ 2, one-tape Turing machines that are allowed to rewrite each tape cell only in the first d visits are equivalent to pushdown automata. This gives a characterization of the class of context-free languages in terms of restricted Turing machines. We discuss these and other related models, by presenting an overview of some fundamental results related to them. Descriptional complexity aspects are also considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pighizzini, G. (2016). Restricted turing machines and language recognition. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9618, pp. 42–56). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30000-9_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free