Validity and reliability of the purdue pegboard test in carpal tunnel syndrome

67Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is a paucity of validated tests to quantify hand function impairment due to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) in CTS patients. We compared 190 CTS patients with 122 healthy, age-matched controls. CTS severity was determined based on electrophysiologic parameters and the Levine Self-Assessment Questionnaire. The time to complete the PPT and the test-retest reliability were tested. The test-retest reliability was high with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.91. Compared to healthy controls, the CTS patients were significantly slower. Although the functional performance generally declined with increasing severity of electrophysiologic abnormalities, the correlation between hand function decline and symptom severity in the young and middle-aged groups was low. We conclude that the PPT is a valid and reliable tool to quantify functional impairment caused by CTS. It can be a useful outcome measure in young and middle-aged patients. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amirjani, N., Ashworth, N. L., Olson, J. L., Morhart, M., & Chan, K. M. (2011). Validity and reliability of the purdue pegboard test in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle and Nerve, 43(2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.21856

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free