Abstract
Background: A systematic review suggests that 25% of oesophageal adenocarcinomas (OAC) are ‘missed’ at index endoscopy for Barrett’s oesophagus (BO); however, this included few population-based studies and may be an overestimate. Objective: The objective of this article is to quantify the ‘missed’ rates of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and OAC at index BO endoscopy. Methods: Patients from the Northern Ireland BO register diagnosed between 1993 and 2010 (n = 13,159) were linked to the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry to identify patients who developed OAC or HGD. Logistic regression analysis compared characteristics of ‘missed’ vs ‘incident’ HGD/OAC, defined as diagnoses within 3–12 months vs >1 year after incident BO, respectively. Results: A total of 267 patients were diagnosed with HGD/OAC ≥3 months after BO diagnosis, of whom 34 (12.7%) were potentially ‘missed’. The proportion of ‘missed’ HGD/OAC was 25% among BO patients with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and 9% among non-dysplastic BO patients. Older age and BO-LGD carried a higher risk of ‘missed’ HGD/OAC. Non-dysplastic BO patients were more often diagnosed with a ‘missed’ OAC (rather than HGD; 89%), compared with BO-LGD patients (40%). Conclusions: Approximately one in 10 HGD/OAC cases are ‘missed’ at incident BO diagnosis, which is significant but lower than previous reports. However, ‘missed’ HGD/OAC cases represent only 0.26% of all BO patients.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
van Putten, M., Johnston, B. T., Murray, L. J., Gavin, A. T., McManus, D. T., Bhat, S., … Coleman, H. G. (2018). ‘Missed’ oesophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus patients: A large population-based study. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 6(4), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640617737466
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.