Comparative study on tool fault diagnosis methods using vibration signals and cutting force signals by machine learning technique

36Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The state of cutting tool determines the quality of surface produced on the machined parts. A faulty tool produces poor surface, inaccurate geometry and non-economic production. Thus, it is necessary to monitor tool condition for a machining process to have superior quality and economic production. In the present study, fault classification of single point cutting tool for hard turning has been carried out by employing machine learning technique. Cutting force and vibration signals were acquired to monitor tool condition during machining. A set of four tooling conditions namely healthy, worn flank, broken insert and extended tool overhang have been considered for the study. The machine learning technique was applied to both vibration and cutting force signals. Discrete wavelet features of the signals have been extracted using discrete wavelet transformation (DWT). This transformation represents a large dataset into approximation coefficients which contain the most useful information of the dataset. Significant features, among features extracted, were selected using J48 decision tree technique. Classification of tool conditions was carried out using Naïve Bayes algorithm. A 10 fold cross validation was incorporated to test the validity of classifier. A comparison of performance of classifier was made between cutting force and vibration signal to choose the best signal acquisition method in classifying tool fault conditions using machine learning technique.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aralikatti, S. S., Ravikumar, K. N., Kumar, H., Shivananda Nayaka, H., & Sugumaran, V. (2020). Comparative study on tool fault diagnosis methods using vibration signals and cutting force signals by machine learning technique. SDHM Structural Durability and Health Monitoring, 14(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.32604/SDHM.2020.07595

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free