Piloting a Supplemental Assessment Tool with Younger Residents of Long-Term Care

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Young adults living with disabilities may sometimes end up in long-term care facilities which may not always meet their needs. Our project set out to pilot a supplemental assessment tool, a questionnaire to be used upon admission of younger adults into long-term care. We wanted the opinions of both staff and younger residents on what modifications may be needed in the implementation processes to ensure effectiveness of the tool. Methods This project followed a qualitative design, implementing a previously designed supplemental assessment tool with five staff members and seven younger residents of two long-term care homes in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Residents completed the questionnaire with members of staff involved in admissions. Each group participated in follow-up interviews regarding their thoughts on implementation of the tool. Responses were analyzed using the constructs of the Consolidated Framework in Implementation Research following direct content analysis methods. Results Feedback from residents and staff suggested that the tool could not be used as a one-size-fits-all solution but that flexibility in the format, content, and structure of the tool would be beneficial to ensure its utility in a variety of settings. Issues raised by staff and residents included, but were not limited to, accessibility of the intervention, the availability of resources, the format of the intervention and topics covered within it, and ensuring that processes for implementation are clearly defined. Conclusions Both staff and residents approved of the tool for use in the admissions process and agreed that it would enhance the admissions practices already in place.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Samson, E. M., Moody, E., & Weeks, L. E. (2024). Piloting a Supplemental Assessment Tool with Younger Residents of Long-Term Care. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 24(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.27.690

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free