Validation of a scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia using an ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy

13Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The need for surgical excision in patients with ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) remains an issue of debate. The present study sought to validate a scoring system (the U score, for underestimation) that we have previously developed for predicting malignancy in CNB-diagnosed ADH. Methods: The study prospectively enrolled 85 female patients with CNB-diagnosed ADH who underwent subsequent surgical excision. Underestimation was defined as a surgical specimen having malignant foci. Results: The overall underestimation rate was 37% (31/85). Multivariate analysis showed that a clinically palpable mass, microcalcification on imaging, size >15 mm and a patient age of ≥ 50 years were independently associated with underestimation. When applied to the scoring system, the validation score was significant (p< 0.001; area under the curve, 0.852). No patient with a U score < 3.5 had an underestimated lesion. Conclusion: The present study successfully validated the efficacy of our scoring system for predicting malignancy in CNB-diagnosed ADH. A U score of ≤ 3.5 indicates that surgical excision may not be necessary. © 2012 Korean Breast Cancer Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J., Han, W., Go, E. Y., Moon, H. G., Ahn, S. K., Shin, H. C., … Noh, D. Y. (2012). Validation of a scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia using an ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Journal of Breast Cancer, 15(4), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free