“Don’t let me be misunderstood” Critical AI literacy for the constructive use of AI technology

22Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

• Research and development as well as societal debates on the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) often focus on crucial but imprac-tical ethical issues or on technocratic approaches to managing societal and ethical risks with technology. To overcome this, more practical, problem-oriented analytical perspectives on the risks of AI are needed. This article proposes an approach that focuses on a meta-risk inherent in AI systems: deep automation bias. It is assumed that the mismatch between system behavior and user practice in specific application con-texts due to AI -based automation is a key trigger for bias and other societal risks. The article presents the main factors of (deep) automation bias and outlines a framework providing indicators for the detection of deep automation bias ultimately triggered by such a mismatch. This approach intends to strengthen problem awareness and critical AI literacy and thereby create some practial use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strauß, S. (2021). “Don’t let me be misunderstood” Critical AI literacy for the constructive use of AI technology. Zeitschrift Fur Technikfolgenabschatzung in Theorie Und Praxis / Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice, 30(3), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.30.3.44

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free