Accountability, asbestos and Indigenous rights: The case of Baryulgil

20Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper documents the history of paternalistic state policies and the effects of asbestos mining on the Indigenous community at Baryulgil in northern New South Wales. Despite the lack of profitability, the asbestos operations continued for over 30 years leaving a legacy of asbestos-related health and environmental issues. The shift of responsibility for Indigenous welfare from the State to a corporate entity is evidenced in this historical study using the lens of historical institutionalism. The Baryulgil case is instructive in a number of ways: it demonstrates the subtlety with which human rights abuses can occur in an environment where paternalistic attitudes towards Indigenous peoples prevail; it demonstrates the clash between pursuit of corporate objectives and human rights; and finally it demonstrates the lack of corporate accountability in the asbestos industry. © The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moerman, L. C., & van der Laan, S. L. (2011). Accountability, asbestos and Indigenous rights: The case of Baryulgil. Accounting History, 16(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373211417992

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free