Is it useful to repeat sacroiliac joint provocative tests post-block?

22Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of repeating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) provocative tests post-block. Design. Thirty-four patients with suspected unilateral mechanical SIJ pain participated. Eleven had confirmed SIJ origin pain (>79% pain relief with fluoroscopically guided comparative local anesthetic intra-articular blocks), whereas 23 were confirmed not to have SIJ origin pain (<80% pain relief with a single local anesthetic intra-articular block). Six SIJ provocative tests were performed 30 minutes prior to and following the blocks. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated for subjects who had three or more positive pre-block SIJ provocative tests and for subjects in whom the majority of the SIJ provocative tests converted from positive to negative (normalized) post-block. Results. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for subjects with three or more positive pre-block SIJ provocative tests were 0.82, 0.57, and 1.9, respectively (P = 0.04). For subjects in whom the majority of the SIJ provocative tests normalized, the sensitivity was 0.89, specificity 0.30, and likelihood ratio 1.3 (P = 0.3). Conclusion. Multiple positive pre-block SIJ provocative tests have diagnostic utility however post-block normalization of SIJ provocative tests does not. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stanford, G., & Burnham, R. S. (2010). Is it useful to repeat sacroiliac joint provocative tests post-block? Pain Medicine, 11(12), 1774–1776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00968.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free