Diabetic major amputation in far north Queensland 1998-2008: What is the Gap for Indigenous patients?

23Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To examine demographic and clinical characteristics of diabetic patients undergoing diabetes-related major amputation in Far North Queensland to identify those at risk. Design: A cohort was examined for differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous groups in age, co-morbidities, indication for amputation and mortality. Attendance at the High Risk Foot Service was also reported. Setting: Far North Queensland. Participants: individuals with major amputations between 1998 and 2008. Main outcome measures: Diabetes-related major amputations and mortality. Results: Of the 143 individuals who underwent major amputation during the study period, 52% were Indigenous. On average, Indigenous amputees were 14 years younger than non-Indigenous amputees. There were more female Indigenous amputees compared with Indigenous male amputees. Indigenous amputees were more likely to suffer from chronic kidney disease (P<0.000) and reside in a remote community (P<0.000). Sepsis as an indication for amputation was more frequent in Indigenous subjects (P=0.019). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality related to the procedure between Indigenous and non-indigenous amputees. Conclusion: Indigenous patients with renal disease living in remote communities are at higher risk of developing limb-threatening diabetic foot complications. Further improvements in self-care, diabetes management and foot-care are required to reduce major amputation rates, particularly for those residing in remote areas. © National Rural Health Alliance Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Rourke, S., Steffen, C., Raulli, A., & Tulip, F. (2013). Diabetic major amputation in far north Queensland 1998-2008: What is the Gap for Indigenous patients? Australian Journal of Rural Health, 21(5), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free