INVERSION OF THE STRAIN‐LIFE AND STRAIN‐STRESS RELATIONSHIPS FOR USE IN METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS

26Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract— Two methods are described for inverting the strainrange/life and strainrange/stressrange equations commonly used in fatigue analysis in order to obtain closed‐form expressions for life and stressrange in terms of strainrange. In the Collocation approach the form used is Nf=A(Δε—Δε0)γ or Nf=A(Δε)Ψ(Δε—Δε0)γ. In the Spline‐Function approach the curve is divided into two regions. At strainranges above where the elastic and plastic lines intersect the equation is Nf=NTR1/c exp δRα; at lower strainranges it is Nf=NTR1/b exp δRβ, where NT is transition life, R is strainrange normalised to transition strainrange, and b, c, α, β, δ are constants determinable from the constants of the equation to be inverted. Similar expressions are derived for the cyclic stress/strain curve in terms of the same constants. The methods are illustrated by an example, and found to have close conformity to the basic equations to be inverted. Copyright © 1979, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

MANSON, S. S. (1979). INVERSION OF THE STRAIN‐LIFE AND STRAIN‐STRESS RELATIONSHIPS FOR USE IN METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 1(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb00366.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free