Efficacy comparison of the novel water-soluble propofol prodrug HX0969w and fospropofol in mice and rats

31Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BackgroundHX0969w is a novel water-soluble prodrug designed to release propofol and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and has a sedative-hypnotic effect. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of HX0969w with fospropofol in mice and rats.MethodsWe performed hydrolysis studies in the plasma from mice and rats. The half-maximal effective doses (ED50) and half-maximal lethal doses (LD50) of fospropofol and HX0969w were determined. A pharmacodynamics comparison of these two compounds was also performed. Time to loss of righting reflex, time to return of righting reflex, recovery time, and adverse effects were recorded.ResultsThe hydrolysis studies demonstrated that HX0969w released propofol as expected. HX0969w ED50 values in mice and rats were 133.03 and 53.79 mg kg-1, respectively, and LD 50 values were 607.11 and 283.79 mg kg-1, respectively. The calculated therapeutic index (TI), safety index (SI), and certain safety factor (CSF) of HX0969w were 4.56, 3.33, and 2.92 for mice, and 5.28, 3.94, and 3.49 for rats, respectively. The pharmacodynamic comparison studies suggest that HX0969w has a longer onset time and shorter duration than fospropofol. ConclusionsSimilar to fospropofol, HX0969w is an effective, water-soluble prodrug that is capable of inducing a sedative-hypnotic effect in mice and rats. Unlike fospropofol, HX0969w releases GHB instead of formaldehyde. Further studies regarding the efficacy and safety of HX0969w are necessary. © The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, Y., Yang, J., Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. S. (2013). Efficacy comparison of the novel water-soluble propofol prodrug HX0969w and fospropofol in mice and rats. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 111(5), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet218

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free