Beyond mutually hurting stalemate: why did the peace process in Turkey (2009–2015) fail?

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study investigates the peace process between the Turkish government and the PKK, invoking the mutually hurting stalemate (MHS) and mutually enticing opportunity (MEO) formulations of Ripeness Theory. It questions why the negotiations failed although Turkey’s conditions had become ripe for resolution. This research shows that even though the ripe moment occurred before the process steered the parties toward the negotiation table, their perspectives regarding the table ultimately changed due to both domestic and international developments. Hence, the MHS seized at the beginning of the process did not turn into the MEO that would lead to resolution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akgül, M., & Görgün Akgül, Ç. (2023). Beyond mutually hurting stalemate: why did the peace process in Turkey (2009–2015) fail? Turkish Studies, 24(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2022.2085094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free