Nanopore duplex sequencing as an alternative to Illumina MiSeq sequencing for eDNA-based biomonitoring of coastal aquaculture impacts

12Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Oxford Nanopore Technologies has recently launched a duplex sequencing strategy and announced an improved error rate which is in a similar order of magnitude as Illumina sequencing. We therefore conducted a pilot study to assess whether Nanopore duplex sequencing has potential to be used as a technology in eDNA-based marine biomonitoring. Specifically, we investigated bacterial communities of sediment samples collected from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture installations and compared the ecological trends obtained from short Illumina (V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene) and long Nanopore (full length 16S rRNA gene) sequence reads. The obtained duplex rate of Nanopore amplicon reads with a Phred score ≥ 30 was 36%, notably higher compared to previous reports from bacterial genome sequencing. When inferring alpha- and beta-diversity from Illumina ASVs and Nanopore OTUs, we found highly congruent ecological patterns. Only when collating ASVs and OTUs across taxonomic ranks, beta-diversity analyses of Illumina-data slightly changed, due to the difficulties to assign a taxonomy to short sequence reads. While on family rank, both sequence datasets had good agreement, genus-assignments of Illumina data were critical, resulting in higher disagreement between the two protocols. Our data provide evidence that eDNA-based monitoring of aquaculture-related environmental impacts could equally well be conducted with the improved Nanopore duplex sequencing. We discuss to what extent eDNA-based biomonitoring could benefit from long-read information.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stoeck, T., Katzenmeier, S. N., Breiner, H. W., & Rubel, V. (2024). Nanopore duplex sequencing as an alternative to Illumina MiSeq sequencing for eDNA-based biomonitoring of coastal aquaculture impacts. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics, 8, 45–68. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.8.121817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free