Migration, Precarization and the Democratic Deficit in Global Governance

59Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article attempts to provide a critical understanding of the dual signification of "precarity". It explores what "precarity" as a concept may potentially offer to studies of the changing contemporary political economy of migration. It discusses shifting trends in global migration and point to tendencies for a possible convergence between "South" and "North", "East" and "West". Based on a review of current advances in research, it discusses, with reference to the classical work of Karl Polanyi, the potential for a contemporary "countermovement" which would challenge the precarity of migrants. Bringing forward the issue of the "space for civil society" the article addresses a still lingering democratic deficit in the global governance of migration. Policy Implications: The article is relevant to policymakers, trade unions and civil society organizations. It contributes to the understanding of policy making processes in emerging multilevel global governance and focuses on issues of precarization, migration, and the implementation and accountability of human, migrant and labour rights.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schierup, C. U., Ålund, A., & Likić-Brborić, B. (2015). Migration, Precarization and the Democratic Deficit in Global Governance. International Migration, 53(3), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12171

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free